Today was a fun day to be a law nerd.
The Korean has said this from Day 1 of this dreadful litigation: if Obamacare was structured as a single-payer public insurance program, complemented by private insurance companies like the majority of advanced nations, ALL this could have been avoided. There would have been no individual mandate, and no constitutionality issue since it would have been exactly like Social Security or Medicare.
Wanna see a successful single-payer system that creates very little administrative delay and a $5 doctor visit? Here is an old post about Korea's healthcare system.
Got a question or a comment about the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Business Lunch for Koreans?
Dear Korean,
I work at a company that will be hosting quite a few business meetings in Houston, TX. Our guests are from Korea and we will be serving lunch for them. I plan on not serving them Korean food as I know it would not be to their standard, as well as when I travel I want to experience new things. Are there foods that I should avoid, like items that would be considered an insult to serve? Are there non-Korean foods that are preferred by most? Are there certain items that should be made available like salt and pepper for most Americans?
Robert T.
First of all, do not be afraid to cater Korean food from local Korean restaurants. It is true that the quality of Korean food in the U.S. may not be as good, and that business travelers would like to try new things. But truth is, few things in America are truly new to Koreans, as most American staple dishes -- burgers, pizza, etc. -- are widely available in Korea. (They may exist in bastardized forms in Korea to fit the local tastes, but at least the concept is familiar to Koreans.)
Serving Korean food for lunch can be a solid gesture of friendship. Especially in case of Korean businesspeople on a long business trip, it could be a welcome relief. If you are having several days of meetings with your Korean business partners, throwing in a Korean-style lunch at least once would be a great idea.
When it comes to serving non-Korean food, here are some pointers:
- Go with hot food: Here is an observation -- Americans like everything a little bit colder than Koreans. This applies to room temperature, drinking water, and most certainly to food. Vast majority of Korean cuisine is very warm, and a significant portion of Korean cuisine is sizzling hot. This means that for many Koreans, a meal that is not hot (or at least warm) is very unsatisfying. If you have salad, try and have hot soup accompanying it. Go for hot sandwiches rather than cold.
(More after the jump.)
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
- Avoid pizza and burgers: If you must serve them, at least make them appear to be expensive. Pizza and burgers, in Korea, have established themselves unhealthy junk food that children might eat once in a while. The concept of high-end gourmet pizzas and burgers is fairly new. Pasta, on the other hand, has entered Korean market as a relatively upscale food, which makes it a good choice.
- Lower on salt, grease and cream: To most Korean palate, typical American food is too salty, too greasy and too creamy. If there is a menu item that can avoid those things, go for that one. To this end, other Asian food (e.g. sushi) is fine.
- Don't forget the accouterments: One of the most essential dishes in Korean food is kimchi -- it is on a Korean table for every. single. meal. (Even, say, an Italian restaurant in Korea would have some kimchi for customers who ask for them.) And the two main flavor profiles of kimchi is spicy and sour. This means that Koreans will generally crave those two flavors for every single meal.
So, in addition to the usual salt and pepper, hot sauce is helpful. Another helpful side is sweet cornichon pickles, which gives the sour profile. (In fact, a lot of non-Korean restaurants in Korea, in an attempt to compromise with Korean customers' yearn for the sour kimchi flavors, usually serve pickles on the side.) Pickled jalapenos -- the kind that usually tops nachos -- are also a good choice.
Finally...
- Don't think too hard: At the end of the day, this will all depend on the individuals. Korea is an export-oriented economy, and its businesspeople travel often. They usually do not expect their business partners to cater to their appetites, and a lot of them are quite used to the way Americans eat. Read and react; don't be obtuse, but don't be pandering either.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
I work at a company that will be hosting quite a few business meetings in Houston, TX. Our guests are from Korea and we will be serving lunch for them. I plan on not serving them Korean food as I know it would not be to their standard, as well as when I travel I want to experience new things. Are there foods that I should avoid, like items that would be considered an insult to serve? Are there non-Korean foods that are preferred by most? Are there certain items that should be made available like salt and pepper for most Americans?
Robert T.
First of all, do not be afraid to cater Korean food from local Korean restaurants. It is true that the quality of Korean food in the U.S. may not be as good, and that business travelers would like to try new things. But truth is, few things in America are truly new to Koreans, as most American staple dishes -- burgers, pizza, etc. -- are widely available in Korea. (They may exist in bastardized forms in Korea to fit the local tastes, but at least the concept is familiar to Koreans.)
Serving Korean food for lunch can be a solid gesture of friendship. Especially in case of Korean businesspeople on a long business trip, it could be a welcome relief. If you are having several days of meetings with your Korean business partners, throwing in a Korean-style lunch at least once would be a great idea.
When it comes to serving non-Korean food, here are some pointers:
- Go with hot food: Here is an observation -- Americans like everything a little bit colder than Koreans. This applies to room temperature, drinking water, and most certainly to food. Vast majority of Korean cuisine is very warm, and a significant portion of Korean cuisine is sizzling hot. This means that for many Koreans, a meal that is not hot (or at least warm) is very unsatisfying. If you have salad, try and have hot soup accompanying it. Go for hot sandwiches rather than cold.
(More after the jump.)
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
- Avoid pizza and burgers: If you must serve them, at least make them appear to be expensive. Pizza and burgers, in Korea, have established themselves unhealthy junk food that children might eat once in a while. The concept of high-end gourmet pizzas and burgers is fairly new. Pasta, on the other hand, has entered Korean market as a relatively upscale food, which makes it a good choice.
- Lower on salt, grease and cream: To most Korean palate, typical American food is too salty, too greasy and too creamy. If there is a menu item that can avoid those things, go for that one. To this end, other Asian food (e.g. sushi) is fine.
- Don't forget the accouterments: One of the most essential dishes in Korean food is kimchi -- it is on a Korean table for every. single. meal. (Even, say, an Italian restaurant in Korea would have some kimchi for customers who ask for them.) And the two main flavor profiles of kimchi is spicy and sour. This means that Koreans will generally crave those two flavors for every single meal.
So, in addition to the usual salt and pepper, hot sauce is helpful. Another helpful side is sweet cornichon pickles, which gives the sour profile. (In fact, a lot of non-Korean restaurants in Korea, in an attempt to compromise with Korean customers' yearn for the sour kimchi flavors, usually serve pickles on the side.) Pickled jalapenos -- the kind that usually tops nachos -- are also a good choice.
Finally...
- Don't think too hard: At the end of the day, this will all depend on the individuals. Korea is an export-oriented economy, and its businesspeople travel often. They usually do not expect their business partners to cater to their appetites, and a lot of them are quite used to the way Americans eat. Read and react; don't be obtuse, but don't be pandering either.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Ask a Korean! News: Pew Center Study on Asian Americans
Is here. A helpful summary of findings in graphics is here. Graphics focused on Korean Americans are here.
One tidbit that caught the Korean's eyes: 82% of Asian Americans report that they are satisfied with life, higher than the national average (which was 75%.) But Tiger Parents totally raise unhappy children who commit suicide, right?
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
One tidbit that caught the Korean's eyes: 82% of Asian Americans report that they are satisfied with life, higher than the national average (which was 75%.) But Tiger Parents totally raise unhappy children who commit suicide, right?
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
How to, Like, Totally Win K-Pop Star
Dear Korean,
I'm going to be auditioning for SM, and JYP what are some things that will get them to respect and take me seriously?
Lizzy L.
This is another breed of stupid questions that the Korean has been receiving a lot lately. Here is the Korean's answer: sing really, really well, then cross your fingers and hope for the best.
To people who keep sending this type of question -- seriously, what the hell did you expect when you sent your question? That this random anonymous blogger has the nuclear launch code that would fast-track you into JYP's heart?
Yes, if you are not Korean, your chances are lower if only because you are not Korean. So what? Did you think you would be considered an automatic finalist if you were Korean? Does it make sense to complain that, in a lottery with a trillion tickets outstanding, you were given eight tickets instead of ten?
If you are auditioning for a TV show, what you are going for is a moonshot. If you are into taking moonshots, please, don't let anyone stop you. But if you are scared away from taking a moonshot just because the moonshot has 0.0000000001% chance instead of 0.0000000002% chance, maybe you should not be in the business of taking moonshots at all.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean. Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
I'm going to be auditioning for SM, and JYP what are some things that will get them to respect and take me seriously?
Lizzy L.
This is another breed of stupid questions that the Korean has been receiving a lot lately. Here is the Korean's answer: sing really, really well, then cross your fingers and hope for the best.
 | |
| Yes, this anonymous blogger totally knows how to crack this thing. (source) |
Yes, if you are not Korean, your chances are lower if only because you are not Korean. So what? Did you think you would be considered an automatic finalist if you were Korean? Does it make sense to complain that, in a lottery with a trillion tickets outstanding, you were given eight tickets instead of ten?
If you are auditioning for a TV show, what you are going for is a moonshot. If you are into taking moonshots, please, don't let anyone stop you. But if you are scared away from taking a moonshot just because the moonshot has 0.0000000001% chance instead of 0.0000000002% chance, maybe you should not be in the business of taking moonshots at all.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean. Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Media Strike in Korea
Dear Korean,
Could you expound a bit on the background of the labour strikes at KBS and, particularly, MBC? I'm given to understand that there's been some kind of political meddling, but as you've intimated before, English-language Korean news sources seem to be lacking in a number of ways.
Charlie
This question is long overdue, as the strike has been going on since January. In fact, KBS union ended its strike last week. In the spirit of better late than never, the Korean is picking up this question for a few reasons, to wit: a lot of Korea-lovers rely on TV shows, and it would be helpful to know why a lot of their favorite shows. And like a lot of Korean history, the background of the media strike is an interesting story of rough-and-tumble intrigue.
Also, the media strike is indirectly responsible for this racist MBC "expose" on interracial relationships in Korea, which can be roughly summarized as: "Dey terk er weemin!" As the regular news staff of MBC has been on strike nearly six months, MBC has been filling its lineup with a lot of crap that are produced by outside production companies. One of the results is that a completely beyond-the-pale program like this one goes through the filters.
First of all, a quick background about TV stations in Korea. The biggest thing you have to remember as you read through the history of TV stations in Korea is that as recently as 1987, Korea was a fascist dictatorship much like a lot of countries in South America were at the same time. Because controlling the media has always been essential to the life of a dictatorship, Korea's TV stations were under the thumb of the government for a very long time. Because of the remnants of those times, Korea's TV stations are still under a huge degree of government control, to a degree that may appear ludicrously unbefitting to a robust democracy.
(More after the jump.)
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Media Consolidation of 1980, and the Aftermath
The most significant event in modern Korean media history, whose effects still resonate today, is an incident called "Media Consolidation" of 1980 [언론 통폐합].
By November 1980, General Chun Doo-Hwan had taken over power by a bloody coup d'etat in which he arrested and/or killed his senior officers, and massacred hundreds of citizens in Gwangju who protested the usurpation. Korea was under martial law during most of 1980, as Chun was consolidating his power. For nearly a year, under the pretense of the martial law, the military government censored every single newspaper and television news reports. The newspaper editors literally had to deliver the draft of the next day's newspaper, pre-printed, to the military government's temporary headquarters, to be reviewed by the censoring officer. The same was true for television/radio news programs and their directors.
The martial law could not go on forever, and Chun knew it. But ending the martial law meant freeing up the media, which would predictably rebel against Chun. Chun's solution was characteristically simple and brutal -- shut down the most "problematic" news organizations, and leave a few alive to serve as the regime's trumpeters.
The result of this was far-reaching. Before the consolidation, Korea had 64 media organizations -- 28 newspapers, 29 television/radio stations, and seven wire services. Vast majority of them were independent and privately owned. After the consolidation, there were only 14 newspapers, three television/radio stations and one wire service. More than 172 magazines were banned. The owners of the media organizations were summoned to the military government's headquarters, and were forced to relinquish their ownership with a gun pointed on their heads. More than 1500 journalists were fired for being critical to the military government, and were blacklisted from the re-organized media companies. As many as 30 of them were sent to Samcheong Gyoyuk-dae [삼청교육대], a hard labor camp that was no better than a North Korean gulag of today.
TV and radio broadcasting companies were the most affected, as they went from 29 stations to merely three. Five broadcasting companies -- Dongyang, Donga, Jeonil, Seohae and Hankuk -- were forcibly merged into Korea Broadcasting System (KBS), a public company, and ceased to exist. Christian Broadcasting System, an instrumental force for democratization movement, was banned from reporting news.
But it was the Munhwa Broadcasting Company that took the greatest hit. MBC, in its original form, was not a single company. Rather, it was a federation of 20 loosely affiliated member stations located in various parts of Korea. Although they shared much of their programming, each member station was privately owned. After the consolidation, however, each affiliate was forced to give up majority of their shares to the MBC based in Seoul, and MBC Seoul, in turn, was forced to give up majority of its shares to KBS.
This is the genesis of Korea's two major network television stations -- KBS and MBC. This structure more or less survived even after Chun's regime fell in 1987. In 1988, the majority shares of MBC (70 percent, to be exact) that KBS used to hold were transferred to Foundation for Broadcast Culture, a non-profit organization whose directors are appointed by Korea Communications Commission. (The president of Korea, in turn, appoints the head of KCC.)
Today, Korea today has three major network television stations -- KBS, MBC and SBS (which opened in 1990.) And Korean government owns 100% of KBS, and 70% of MBC. Ludicrous, right?
Media under Lee Myeong-Bak Administration
The legal ownership structure of MBC did not change since the democratization of Korea, but in practicality, MBC became a private company since 1988. MBC made money entirely through advertisement income, without receiving any taxpayer support. (In contrast, KBS 1 TV carries no advertisement, and is instead supported by taxpayer money.) As MBC practically grew in its independence, its news desk came to lean more strongly toward the progressive side of Korean politics, critical of the conservative Lee Myeong-Bak administration that took the Blue House in 2007.
In June 2008, Lee Myeong-Bak administration made a concession to the United States by relaxing its stance against Mad Cow Disease control. MBC's news bureau began hammering away at Lee administration for endangering public health. Particularly effective was MBC's PD Notebook, an esteemed news magazine show, which ran an expose on the danger of Mad Cow Disease in American beef. Several days of massive protests ensued, to a point that there were whispers that President Lee might have to resign.
The protests eventually faded out, and the President survived. But it is safe to say that the protests completely traumatized the Lee Administration, for the Lee Administration sought to exact its revenge on the major actors of that episode for the next several years leading up to today. And of course, the media, and particularly MBC, was the prime target.
The first volley was in December 2008, when the conservative Grand National Party (which is now called the New Frontier Party) proposed an amendment to the Media Law, which would allow newspapers to operate network television stations also. On its face, this law appears to be an act of liberalization, as it opens up the TV market to new players. But the subtext was obvious, because only the largest newspapers (i.e. the conservative ones) would be able to afford to open the television stations. From the progressives' perspective, it was a transparent ploy to give more firepower to the conservative news organizations. In July 2009, the Grand National Party rammed through the bill in the National Assembly against the fiercely physical opposition from the Democratic Party. Later, Korea's Constitutional Court ruled that the procedure by which the GNP passed the bill was unconstitutional, but curiously refused to strike down the law.
At least, the Media Law move had a pretty decent cover -- in theory, it is not a bad thing that there are more network television stations. Other steps taken by the administration, however, were self-evident attempts to suppress the media.
Remember how MBC's president is appointed. The president of Korea appoints the head of the Korean Communications Commission; the KCC appoints the directors of Foundation of Broadcast Culture; then the directors of FBC appoints the head of MBC. This chain of command was mostly reduced to formalism since the end of the dictatorship. But under this administration, the presidential influence over MBC's executives became much more overt.
MBC's PD Notebook, the program that did the most to fan the flames of the Mad Cow beef protest, was hit the hardest. MBC executives nixed several items from PD Notebook that would have been critical of the Lee Administration. Six out of 11 production directors (i.e. the PDs) of PD Notebook were moved to a different department. Some of the PDs who defied the management's order and ran the programs that were nixed, were transferred to a department in MBC that has nothing to do with directing a television program. (One of the PDs, for example, was transferred to a department that manages the land that MBC owns, for the purpose of on-location filming.)
Other MBC programs that tended to be critical toward the administration were arbitrarily cancelled, or the hosts of the shows were replaced. At least six MBC television or radio shows, generally perceived to be more critical about the government, were cancelled or had their hosts replaced.
The National Union of Media Workers, the labor union for journalists and employees of media companies in Korea, went on strike several times to protest these moves. The union went on strike three times in 2009, to protest the Media Law amendment. More recently, on December 1, 2011, the union led a nationwide strike, participated by 45 media companies, to protest the opening of four new network television stations -- which were, as expected, affiliated with the four largest conservative newspapers of Korea.
Within MBC, the conflict between the union and the management crested in January of this year. Pursuant to company regulations, MBC's labor union demanded the management to replace the executives who were in charge of the news desk (i.e. the same executives who cancelled scheduled programs.) MBC's management, in response, summarily relieved Park Seong-Ho (one of the leaders of the union) from his job as an anchorman. On January 25, MBC's journalists voted to boycott news production. Finally, the entire MBC union voted to a total strike on January 30, demanding MBC's president to resign and establish procedure to ensure fair reporting. The entire MBC -- not just news, but dramas, show programs, everything -- was shutting down. Popular shows like "Infinite Challenge" [무한도전] and "We Got Married" [우리 결혼했어요] were immediately cancelled. MBC's journalists took to YouTube to air "the Real MBC Newsdesk," their own version of "MBC Newsdesk," MBC's flagship news show.
MBC's management dug in their heels. The management suspended or fired more than 100 union members, sued the labor union for interfering with business, and ordered the union to return to their posts. As a part of the lawsuit, the management petitioned the court to freeze the assets of the union leaders and the union itself, and the court granted the petition. The management also paid bonus to the employees who did not participate in the strike. The union responded by revealing the management's corporate credit card statement, which showed that MBC's president spent more than $700,000 in two years -- three times as much as his predecessor. The statement showed huge amounts spent in designer boutiques, jewelry stores and four star hotels, arousing suspicion that MBC's president was using his corporate card for his mistress.
As the strike continued, the unions for other television stations began to join. KBS union began striking on March 6. YTN, a cable news television, began striking on March 8. The unions for Yonhap News (Korea's only wire service) and Kukmin Ilbo, a newspaper, also began striking.
And that is the state of play as of now. KBS union ended its strike on June 7, and Kukmin Ilbo ended its strike on June 12. But MBC, YTN and Yonhap News are continuing on with their strike. At this point, the media strike is far beyond the point at which the MBC management alone could handle. The striking unions are now demanding that the National Assembly hold a hearing to investigate the precise connection between the MBC management and the Lee Administration. Barring something dramatic, MBC's strike will continue to drag on.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Could you expound a bit on the background of the labour strikes at KBS and, particularly, MBC? I'm given to understand that there's been some kind of political meddling, but as you've intimated before, English-language Korean news sources seem to be lacking in a number of ways.
Charlie
This question is long overdue, as the strike has been going on since January. In fact, KBS union ended its strike last week. In the spirit of better late than never, the Korean is picking up this question for a few reasons, to wit: a lot of Korea-lovers rely on TV shows, and it would be helpful to know why a lot of their favorite shows. And like a lot of Korean history, the background of the media strike is an interesting story of rough-and-tumble intrigue.
Also, the media strike is indirectly responsible for this racist MBC "expose" on interracial relationships in Korea, which can be roughly summarized as: "Dey terk er weemin!" As the regular news staff of MBC has been on strike nearly six months, MBC has been filling its lineup with a lot of crap that are produced by outside production companies. One of the results is that a completely beyond-the-pale program like this one goes through the filters.
(Aside: The Korean really does not have much to add on this whole thing without repeating what others have already said. It was racist, misogynistic and shitty. Even Koreans in Korea have overwhelmingly called this program out as racist, misogynistic and shitty.
The Korean would like to point out one thing though: only 17 people showed up in the protest in front of MBC. Seventeen. Even though the Facebook group denouncing the program has nearly 9,000 members. You want things to change? It's not going to happen with clicking a few things on Facebook.)
First of all, a quick background about TV stations in Korea. The biggest thing you have to remember as you read through the history of TV stations in Korea is that as recently as 1987, Korea was a fascist dictatorship much like a lot of countries in South America were at the same time. Because controlling the media has always been essential to the life of a dictatorship, Korea's TV stations were under the thumb of the government for a very long time. Because of the remnants of those times, Korea's TV stations are still under a huge degree of government control, to a degree that may appear ludicrously unbefitting to a robust democracy.
(More after the jump.)
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Media Consolidation of 1980, and the Aftermath
The most significant event in modern Korean media history, whose effects still resonate today, is an incident called "Media Consolidation" of 1980 [언론 통폐합].
By November 1980, General Chun Doo-Hwan had taken over power by a bloody coup d'etat in which he arrested and/or killed his senior officers, and massacred hundreds of citizens in Gwangju who protested the usurpation. Korea was under martial law during most of 1980, as Chun was consolidating his power. For nearly a year, under the pretense of the martial law, the military government censored every single newspaper and television news reports. The newspaper editors literally had to deliver the draft of the next day's newspaper, pre-printed, to the military government's temporary headquarters, to be reviewed by the censoring officer. The same was true for television/radio news programs and their directors.
The martial law could not go on forever, and Chun knew it. But ending the martial law meant freeing up the media, which would predictably rebel against Chun. Chun's solution was characteristically simple and brutal -- shut down the most "problematic" news organizations, and leave a few alive to serve as the regime's trumpeters.
The result of this was far-reaching. Before the consolidation, Korea had 64 media organizations -- 28 newspapers, 29 television/radio stations, and seven wire services. Vast majority of them were independent and privately owned. After the consolidation, there were only 14 newspapers, three television/radio stations and one wire service. More than 172 magazines were banned. The owners of the media organizations were summoned to the military government's headquarters, and were forced to relinquish their ownership with a gun pointed on their heads. More than 1500 journalists were fired for being critical to the military government, and were blacklisted from the re-organized media companies. As many as 30 of them were sent to Samcheong Gyoyuk-dae [삼청교육대], a hard labor camp that was no better than a North Korean gulag of today.
TV and radio broadcasting companies were the most affected, as they went from 29 stations to merely three. Five broadcasting companies -- Dongyang, Donga, Jeonil, Seohae and Hankuk -- were forcibly merged into Korea Broadcasting System (KBS), a public company, and ceased to exist. Christian Broadcasting System, an instrumental force for democratization movement, was banned from reporting news.
But it was the Munhwa Broadcasting Company that took the greatest hit. MBC, in its original form, was not a single company. Rather, it was a federation of 20 loosely affiliated member stations located in various parts of Korea. Although they shared much of their programming, each member station was privately owned. After the consolidation, however, each affiliate was forced to give up majority of their shares to the MBC based in Seoul, and MBC Seoul, in turn, was forced to give up majority of its shares to KBS.
This is the genesis of Korea's two major network television stations -- KBS and MBC. This structure more or less survived even after Chun's regime fell in 1987. In 1988, the majority shares of MBC (70 percent, to be exact) that KBS used to hold were transferred to Foundation for Broadcast Culture, a non-profit organization whose directors are appointed by Korea Communications Commission. (The president of Korea, in turn, appoints the head of KCC.)
Today, Korea today has three major network television stations -- KBS, MBC and SBS (which opened in 1990.) And Korean government owns 100% of KBS, and 70% of MBC. Ludicrous, right?
(Aside: Guess who owns the remaining 30% of MBC, by the way. It is Jeongsu Scholarship Foundation, i.e. the nonprofit foundation to which the late dictator Park Chung-Hee funneled his slush funds, part of which were the shares in MBC. The current presidential forerunner of the conservative New Frontier Party is Park Chung-Hee's daughter Park Geun-Hye, and she was the chairwoman of JSF until she entered party politics. Isn't Korean politics fascinating?)
Another effect of media consolidation is that, quite obviously, only the pro-military government media companies managed to survive. Further, the success of the media companies, post-consolidation, was directly correlated to how vigorously those newspapers sucked up to the military government. This affected newspapers more than the TV stations, since the newspapers were still privately owned. Consequently, the three largest newspapers of Korea today -- Chosun, JoongAng and Dong-A -- are reliably conservative. This will become relevant in understanding what is going on today.
Media under Lee Myeong-Bak Administration
The legal ownership structure of MBC did not change since the democratization of Korea, but in practicality, MBC became a private company since 1988. MBC made money entirely through advertisement income, without receiving any taxpayer support. (In contrast, KBS 1 TV carries no advertisement, and is instead supported by taxpayer money.) As MBC practically grew in its independence, its news desk came to lean more strongly toward the progressive side of Korean politics, critical of the conservative Lee Myeong-Bak administration that took the Blue House in 2007.
In June 2008, Lee Myeong-Bak administration made a concession to the United States by relaxing its stance against Mad Cow Disease control. MBC's news bureau began hammering away at Lee administration for endangering public health. Particularly effective was MBC's PD Notebook, an esteemed news magazine show, which ran an expose on the danger of Mad Cow Disease in American beef. Several days of massive protests ensued, to a point that there were whispers that President Lee might have to resign.
The protests eventually faded out, and the President survived. But it is safe to say that the protests completely traumatized the Lee Administration, for the Lee Administration sought to exact its revenge on the major actors of that episode for the next several years leading up to today. And of course, the media, and particularly MBC, was the prime target.
The first volley was in December 2008, when the conservative Grand National Party (which is now called the New Frontier Party) proposed an amendment to the Media Law, which would allow newspapers to operate network television stations also. On its face, this law appears to be an act of liberalization, as it opens up the TV market to new players. But the subtext was obvious, because only the largest newspapers (i.e. the conservative ones) would be able to afford to open the television stations. From the progressives' perspective, it was a transparent ploy to give more firepower to the conservative news organizations. In July 2009, the Grand National Party rammed through the bill in the National Assembly against the fiercely physical opposition from the Democratic Party. Later, Korea's Constitutional Court ruled that the procedure by which the GNP passed the bill was unconstitutional, but curiously refused to strike down the law.
At least, the Media Law move had a pretty decent cover -- in theory, it is not a bad thing that there are more network television stations. Other steps taken by the administration, however, were self-evident attempts to suppress the media.
Remember how MBC's president is appointed. The president of Korea appoints the head of the Korean Communications Commission; the KCC appoints the directors of Foundation of Broadcast Culture; then the directors of FBC appoints the head of MBC. This chain of command was mostly reduced to formalism since the end of the dictatorship. But under this administration, the presidential influence over MBC's executives became much more overt.
MBC's PD Notebook, the program that did the most to fan the flames of the Mad Cow beef protest, was hit the hardest. MBC executives nixed several items from PD Notebook that would have been critical of the Lee Administration. Six out of 11 production directors (i.e. the PDs) of PD Notebook were moved to a different department. Some of the PDs who defied the management's order and ran the programs that were nixed, were transferred to a department in MBC that has nothing to do with directing a television program. (One of the PDs, for example, was transferred to a department that manages the land that MBC owns, for the purpose of on-location filming.)
Other MBC programs that tended to be critical toward the administration were arbitrarily cancelled, or the hosts of the shows were replaced. At least six MBC television or radio shows, generally perceived to be more critical about the government, were cancelled or had their hosts replaced.
The National Union of Media Workers, the labor union for journalists and employees of media companies in Korea, went on strike several times to protest these moves. The union went on strike three times in 2009, to protest the Media Law amendment. More recently, on December 1, 2011, the union led a nationwide strike, participated by 45 media companies, to protest the opening of four new network television stations -- which were, as expected, affiliated with the four largest conservative newspapers of Korea.
Within MBC, the conflict between the union and the management crested in January of this year. Pursuant to company regulations, MBC's labor union demanded the management to replace the executives who were in charge of the news desk (i.e. the same executives who cancelled scheduled programs.) MBC's management, in response, summarily relieved Park Seong-Ho (one of the leaders of the union) from his job as an anchorman. On January 25, MBC's journalists voted to boycott news production. Finally, the entire MBC union voted to a total strike on January 30, demanding MBC's president to resign and establish procedure to ensure fair reporting. The entire MBC -- not just news, but dramas, show programs, everything -- was shutting down. Popular shows like "Infinite Challenge" [무한도전] and "We Got Married" [우리 결혼했어요] were immediately cancelled. MBC's journalists took to YouTube to air "the Real MBC Newsdesk," their own version of "MBC Newsdesk," MBC's flagship news show.
MBC's management dug in their heels. The management suspended or fired more than 100 union members, sued the labor union for interfering with business, and ordered the union to return to their posts. As a part of the lawsuit, the management petitioned the court to freeze the assets of the union leaders and the union itself, and the court granted the petition. The management also paid bonus to the employees who did not participate in the strike. The union responded by revealing the management's corporate credit card statement, which showed that MBC's president spent more than $700,000 in two years -- three times as much as his predecessor. The statement showed huge amounts spent in designer boutiques, jewelry stores and four star hotels, arousing suspicion that MBC's president was using his corporate card for his mistress.
As the strike continued, the unions for other television stations began to join. KBS union began striking on March 6. YTN, a cable news television, began striking on March 8. The unions for Yonhap News (Korea's only wire service) and Kukmin Ilbo, a newspaper, also began striking.
And that is the state of play as of now. KBS union ended its strike on June 7, and Kukmin Ilbo ended its strike on June 12. But MBC, YTN and Yonhap News are continuing on with their strike. At this point, the media strike is far beyond the point at which the MBC management alone could handle. The striking unions are now demanding that the National Assembly hold a hearing to investigate the precise connection between the MBC management and the Lee Administration. Barring something dramatic, MBC's strike will continue to drag on.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Ask a Korean! Wiki: Natural Style Deodorants
What do you do when you don't have time to answer questions? Have other people answer them! Cue the question:
Dear Korean,
I was wondering if you knew much about "natural" style deodorants' availability in Korea (i.e Tom's of Maine and JASON brands, or comparable brands). I unwisely didn't pack a long-term supply of deodorant when I came here, and now I'm running out. I don't want to use antiperspirant and would like to avoid deodorants laced with a bunch of synthetic chemicals.
Scott in Chungju
Sorry, Scott in Chungju, you are speaking to a guy who has never bought a stick of deodorant in his life. And it is not because the Korean is gross. Asians generally have significantly less apocrine sweat glands in their armpits, making them less susceptible to armpit stench. Either that or the Korean has a bad sense of smell, and everyone around him in his whole life has been exceedingly polite.
At any rate, deodorant always has been a sticking point with the expat population in Korea. So weigh in, folks. Have you been able to find a fru-fru, "natural" style deodorant in Korea?
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Dear Korean,
I was wondering if you knew much about "natural" style deodorants' availability in Korea (i.e Tom's of Maine and JASON brands, or comparable brands). I unwisely didn't pack a long-term supply of deodorant when I came here, and now I'm running out. I don't want to use antiperspirant and would like to avoid deodorants laced with a bunch of synthetic chemicals.
Scott in Chungju
Sorry, Scott in Chungju, you are speaking to a guy who has never bought a stick of deodorant in his life. And it is not because the Korean is gross. Asians generally have significantly less apocrine sweat glands in their armpits, making them less susceptible to armpit stench. Either that or the Korean has a bad sense of smell, and everyone around him in his whole life has been exceedingly polite.
At any rate, deodorant always has been a sticking point with the expat population in Korea. So weigh in, folks. Have you been able to find a fru-fru, "natural" style deodorant in Korea?
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
After a long period of relatively low tide at the Korean's day job, the tide has turned completely and is swallowing him up. The Korean knows you guys want to talk about a lot of things, like that racist MBC segment, attack of the creationists, etc., but the Korean simply needs to keep his day job, sorry. The Korean hopes to resume updates next week.
Military Draft Quandary
Dear Korean,
I'm the 23 year old son of two Korean parents who were both and raised in South Korea and just recently denounced their Korean citizenship (about 5 years ago). They immigrated to the US before I was born and gave birth to me while they were still Korean citizens in the process of becoming U.S. citizens. They forgot to however claim me on their forms in South Korea as their son after I was born and just assumed everything was okay. Finally about a week ago they stated that I was not allowed back into Korea or else I would have to serve in the military because I was born before they became U.S. citizens and so technically I am still a Korean citizen and I hold dual citizenship.
Do I hold dual citizenship because my parents were still Korean citizens when I was born?
Paul
Before we begin, the Korean must give the usual caveat: The Korean is not an immigration attorney of Korea. This post is for broad informational purposes only. Do NOT ask him about your specific situation, because he cannot possibly give a competent answer that fits your situation. Immigration law and conscription law of Korea are complicated things, and you must consult an attorney if you are seriously worried about your situation.
Having said that...
Paul's is a situation that has been happening a lot lately. Although Paul's email did not ask this question directly, the natural follow-up question is: "Will I be drafted into Korean military? What steps can I take to avoid getting drafted if I visit Korea?" It may sound absurd that someone like Paul, who was born and raised in the U.S., may be conscripted into Korean military. But because of an odd and unintended combination of Korean laws, this is a distinct possibility.
Military service in Korea has always been an extremely sensitive social issue. Like the Social Security in the U.S., it may as well be called one of Korea's "third rail issue" -- touch it, and you die. Particularly among Korean men, there is a (justifiably) huge sense of sacrifice for devoting two to three years of the prime of youth to serve the country. Accordingly, the consequences for draft-dodgers are swift and harsh.
This issue began its course a decade ago. In 2002, popular singer/rapper Yoo Seung-Joon very publicly pledged that he would serve his military duty, then suddenly went back on his word. As a dual citizen between Korea and U.S., Yoo renounced his Korean citizenship to avoid getting drafted. Huge public uproar ensued, destroying Yoo's career and rendering him essentially a persona non grata in Korea. Finally in 2005, Korea's National Assembly passed a law that prohibited dual citizenship holders who were over 18 years plus three months of age (and therefore draft-eligible) from renouncing Korean citizenship. (The previous rule was that the dual citizen automatically lost his citizenship if he did not elect to stay as a Korean citizen before the age of 22.) There was a Constitutional Court challenge against this law, but the court found the law to be constitutional.
This much was not too onerous, actually. In 2005, all dual citizens in Korea knew who they were -- if you were born as a dual citizen, that fact is rather hard to miss. In order to avoid Korea's draft, a male dual citizen simply had to renounce their Korean citizenship before turning 18 years and 3 months old.
The real problem began in 2010. In 2010, in an attempt to liberalize citizenship laws and make the lives easier for diaspora Koreans, the National Assembly began allowing dual citizenship. One condition for having a dual citizenship was that a dual citizenship holder must fulfill all his duties as a Korean citizen, and may not exercise the privileges afforded to non-Korean citizens. For our purpose, this means -- he must report to the draft, and cannot give the excuse that he is not a Korean citizen.
The unintended consequence of the 2010 law that, all of a sudden, it created a large number of Korean dual citizenship holders who did not even know that they were dual citizens. If you are a draft-eligible age, and you realized only recently that you were in fact a dual citizen, you cannot even renounce your Korean citizenship because of the 2005 law. The result: we have a messed up situation in which diaspora Koreans, who may have never visited Korea and not speak a lick of Korean, may be draft eligible for Korean military. He can enter Korea freely, but may get stopped at the airport on his way out of Korea, like all other draft-eligible male Korean citizens.
Unfortunately, there is no good way out of this. However unintended, this is how the law is today. If you have a non-Korean passport, you may simply be able to avoid detection and travel to Korea. But that will be more difficult to do if you, for example, stay in Korea for more than a month and attend a school or get a job. The only likely way this will change is through litigation, especially because it would be a political suicide for a Korean legislator to touch this issue. Until the situation is resolved differently, if you are a male between the ages of 18 and 37, born to parents who are/were Korean citizens, the Korean would highly recommend speaking with an attorney in Korea before you make a mid- to long-term stay in Korea.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
I'm the 23 year old son of two Korean parents who were both and raised in South Korea and just recently denounced their Korean citizenship (about 5 years ago). They immigrated to the US before I was born and gave birth to me while they were still Korean citizens in the process of becoming U.S. citizens. They forgot to however claim me on their forms in South Korea as their son after I was born and just assumed everything was okay. Finally about a week ago they stated that I was not allowed back into Korea or else I would have to serve in the military because I was born before they became U.S. citizens and so technically I am still a Korean citizen and I hold dual citizenship.
Do I hold dual citizenship because my parents were still Korean citizens when I was born?
Paul
Before we begin, the Korean must give the usual caveat: The Korean is not an immigration attorney of Korea. This post is for broad informational purposes only. Do NOT ask him about your specific situation, because he cannot possibly give a competent answer that fits your situation. Immigration law and conscription law of Korea are complicated things, and you must consult an attorney if you are seriously worried about your situation.
Having said that...
Paul's is a situation that has been happening a lot lately. Although Paul's email did not ask this question directly, the natural follow-up question is: "Will I be drafted into Korean military? What steps can I take to avoid getting drafted if I visit Korea?" It may sound absurd that someone like Paul, who was born and raised in the U.S., may be conscripted into Korean military. But because of an odd and unintended combination of Korean laws, this is a distinct possibility.
Military service in Korea has always been an extremely sensitive social issue. Like the Social Security in the U.S., it may as well be called one of Korea's "third rail issue" -- touch it, and you die. Particularly among Korean men, there is a (justifiably) huge sense of sacrifice for devoting two to three years of the prime of youth to serve the country. Accordingly, the consequences for draft-dodgers are swift and harsh.
This issue began its course a decade ago. In 2002, popular singer/rapper Yoo Seung-Joon very publicly pledged that he would serve his military duty, then suddenly went back on his word. As a dual citizen between Korea and U.S., Yoo renounced his Korean citizenship to avoid getting drafted. Huge public uproar ensued, destroying Yoo's career and rendering him essentially a persona non grata in Korea. Finally in 2005, Korea's National Assembly passed a law that prohibited dual citizenship holders who were over 18 years plus three months of age (and therefore draft-eligible) from renouncing Korean citizenship. (The previous rule was that the dual citizen automatically lost his citizenship if he did not elect to stay as a Korean citizen before the age of 22.) There was a Constitutional Court challenge against this law, but the court found the law to be constitutional.
 |
| If you are dealing with this issue, you can blame this guy (source) |
The real problem began in 2010. In 2010, in an attempt to liberalize citizenship laws and make the lives easier for diaspora Koreans, the National Assembly began allowing dual citizenship. One condition for having a dual citizenship was that a dual citizenship holder must fulfill all his duties as a Korean citizen, and may not exercise the privileges afforded to non-Korean citizens. For our purpose, this means -- he must report to the draft, and cannot give the excuse that he is not a Korean citizen.
The unintended consequence of the 2010 law that, all of a sudden, it created a large number of Korean dual citizenship holders who did not even know that they were dual citizens. If you are a draft-eligible age, and you realized only recently that you were in fact a dual citizen, you cannot even renounce your Korean citizenship because of the 2005 law. The result: we have a messed up situation in which diaspora Koreans, who may have never visited Korea and not speak a lick of Korean, may be draft eligible for Korean military. He can enter Korea freely, but may get stopped at the airport on his way out of Korea, like all other draft-eligible male Korean citizens.
Unfortunately, there is no good way out of this. However unintended, this is how the law is today. If you have a non-Korean passport, you may simply be able to avoid detection and travel to Korea. But that will be more difficult to do if you, for example, stay in Korea for more than a month and attend a school or get a job. The only likely way this will change is through litigation, especially because it would be a political suicide for a Korean legislator to touch this issue. Until the situation is resolved differently, if you are a male between the ages of 18 and 37, born to parents who are/were Korean citizens, the Korean would highly recommend speaking with an attorney in Korea before you make a mid- to long-term stay in Korea.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)